This week's topic had me feeling very divided upon the field of biotech and art. In terms of genetically modifying plants, I see there's no issues with it. I found George Gessert's work of genetically modifying flowers to be very beautiful.
![]() |
| Genetically modified flowers |
On the other hand, once the modification reaches humans and other animals, it's hard to figure out where to draw the line. Chris Kelty's had stated that one of the reasons why people become anxious about this topic is because of knowing that humans have the power to bend life to our own will (3). I think for me this was the main issue that I have with mutating humans and animals. I think using people's lives as an expression of art is fine (ex. dance performances, their lifestyle). However, I feel a bit uncomfortable with the concept of mutating one's body as a form of art. I think life is fragile and valuable so it isn't right to treat it carelessly. Thus, I believe there should be restrictions on both scientists and artists on how much they are able to mutate humans/animals in their works.
![]() |
| Kathy High's test rat |
![]() |
| Human-pig hybrid |
![]() |
| Mole Human in the animation |
Works Cited
- Blakemore, Erin. "Human-Pig Hybrid Created in the Lab." National Geographic. National Geographic Society, 26 Jan. 2017. Web. 09 May 2017.
- 5 BioArt Pt2. Dir. Uconlineprogram. Perf. Victoria Vesna. Youtube, 17 May 2012. Web. 9 May 2017.
- "From the New World (novel)." Wikipedia. N.p., 16 Apr. 2017. Web. 09 May 2017.
- Kelty, Chris. Meanings of Participation: Outlaw Biology? Rep. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
- "Shinsekai Yori and True Heroism" Reddit. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 May 2017.
|




I agree with how you feel about both plants and animals. I think that there should be restrictions dealing with biotech + art that deals with animals and humans. I think that humans should have to consent to this type of art. Meanwhile, I think that they should cease this type of stuff on animals. It is inhumane to experiment on animals that have no say over whether or not they can/should be tested on. On this note, what type of restrictions should be placed on this type of biotech + art?
ReplyDeleteI agree with your opinions on the treatment of animals and humans. It seems that genetically modifying plants isn't so worrisome because they don't have a conscience. It is definitely controversial with animals and plants. I feel like just because certain procedures/experiments can be done with current technology doesn't mean we should regardless if it is for science or art. Also, your point about how society would treat a half-animal and half-human was very interesting. Personally, I feel like it should have the rights people do, which wouldn't allow for it to be used to grow organs. It definitely made me realize that there is alot of areas where society has placed no restrictions.
ReplyDelete